|
SubscriptionsSites I Read
|
|
bassaf
|
|
| On Writing Well
I wrote in my recent blog, "What's In Your Basement?" about some college papers I found. Before that, I had posted one of the best papers I wrote in school, named, "The Prayer Garden". Writing it changed me; the work I put into it forged my professor's lessons in my brain. She gave me an A+ and marked the paper with comments that actually honored me. It gave me reason to believe I could really be something.I lamented that I only had the electronic copy, but later I found the original paper with all of my professor's marks on it. Better yet, I found the first version of it that I had written at the beginning of the class. Between these two stories, I had grown from a talented kid with good grammar into a competent writer who knew how to work. Those papers were the treasures I had found in my basement and I was so excited about. I left a teaser at the end of my last post with a promise to show something better — my professor's writing. They were just a teacher's markups, but I can see her quality in them. I hope you do, too.Below are my scans from my first essay and the rewrite that earned my A+. [The web page may not show them at full resolution, but you can usually right-click (or control-click) and select "View Image" to see them at full scale. They will be much easier to read that way.]I found the two papers when I was looking one of my favourite textbooks, "On Writing Well" by an author named Zinsser. It was the textbook for my composition practicuum and had some lessons in it I would like to read again. I still have not found the book, but I can share a few things from it and my professor.I mentioned Dr. Nancy Pope in my last entry. The red markups on my papers are hers. In the first version of my paper she gave me a generous B. Her criticisms were as gentle as she could make them but they hit home. She did a marvelous teaching job just with her comments; both compliments and criticisms were honest, accurate, and concise. It made me trust her opinions right from the start.Here is my first version, from the beginning of the class. If you compare the first two paragraphs of both versions you will see how different the style and mood is. Dr. Pope kindly called my opening, "Rather strained," but to many it seems smart-alecky or even angry. She met each of us in her office for a personal discussion of each paper and leave us with a list of items we needed to correct. In my meeting with her I had to agree that I was trying to show off and that I came across as arrogant, but I was still a little disappointed that she did not notice that I was trying to mimic the style of Douglas Adams, author of The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
I also had to defend my statement about what Southern Baptists taught, explaining that I did not want to speak for other groups and did not mean to imply that only Southern Baptists believed God to be omnipresent. My defense was valid, but the problem was that it left too many assumptions up to the reader and simply became a distraction.Here is the ending of my first paper. You can read the entire criticism. When I first read it I felt proud that she recognized my technical skill yet shamed at how I had taken my spiritual experience and shredded it with my arrogance. She was right on target when she called my first page flippant and crude.
I find the last comment, that I needed to control my desire to show off all my talents in two pages, particularly interesting because I recently bought Nellie McKay's album "Get Away from Me" and found that she has received the same criticism. Dr. Pope knew what she was doing when she made me rewrite my first essay. It was more than an opportunity to practise and demonstrate my new skills, and more than an exercise in serious rewriting. It forced me to criticize my own work and abandon my delusions of greatness, and then it proved that I had actually learned something about writing. Here are partial scans of my rewrite along with some of my own commentary. The complete essay is in my earlier blog, "The Garden." "Much more useful opening" — I had a much better start on my rewrite. When you compare these two paragraphs to the first version, you are looking at the result of a lot of cutting and soul-searching. This version was much harder to write than the first. The story I wanted to tell was very important to me and I was determined to tell it right. The first thing I did was get honest with myself. Being brutally honest with myself let me remove pretense and strip off layers of pride until I could see exactly what I was trying to say. In the process I had to delete so much that it hurt, removing even my most clever lines, but it was worth it. The new version quickly gets to the point without wasting words and feels much more mature. I think it is even more kind.Dr. Pope pushed hard for us to learn kindness as writers. Kindness required respect. Being clever, dancing around the topic, and trying to talk above my readers simply insulted and frustrated them. That lesson was a hard one to swallow.
Notice how little she marked on this second page. And, please do not strain your eyes trying to read it — you can find the whole paper in an earlier blog.
Here is the end of the paper and a big pot of gold. I tried very hard to please and impress Dr. Pope, but I never thought it possible to get the response she gave. I felt like I had just been given the Pulitzer Prize. ["Beautiful! I kept meaning to mark up the 3rd-7th paragraphs, as I had the first 2, with all my appreciation of their style and content, but I kept re-reading them my pen suspended in the air — a greater compliment! A+"]My friend Will said, "It just doesn't get any better than that," and that I ought to frame it. I think I will.
| | |
| - "Your Fortune" - June 30, 2007
-
Today we went to the New Saint Louis Wok — the place where the owner
always asks about "the young man that was with you" every time he is
not with us. When he is with us, he orders a crab rangoon appetizer and
usually eats all six. Today he shared them with us. He barely ate
anything because he has been nervous about his first airplane trip to
San Jose, tomorrow. This will be a week at a national Mennonite
conference and he has been excited about it all week. He even wanted us
to go out to eat somewhere special before he left. That is Arlando, by
the way. We had a nice dinner and afterward I collected the fortunes
from the cookies. "The respect of influential people will soon be yours."
That was my fortune. I believe Arlando will be an influential person
and I do have his respect. Many others fall in that list. Some are just
starting out, some have a long reputation. I am tempted to drop names
but I will save that for the 6 Degrees of Separation game. "You are romantic and adventurous."I
got that one last year and it is my favorite. I usually do not think of
myself that way, but it is true. The romance part some of you know,
though it has been a while since I expressed myself that way. I think
it still shows up in my letters, though not like when I used to leave
notes for Cathy. [Sounds like I have some catching up to do]. The
adventure part is not as obvious, but over the years I have become
risk-tolerant. I think hanging around Cathy did that. I will do
something that is very difficult and not let the prospect of failure
stop me. It is still hard to take risks, but I have a track record for
it. For instance, I quit a stable job and took a $10,000 pay cut so I
could teach High School math. I ride public transportation and talk to
strangers. I have taken on many challenging projects in my career. I
went to grad school. Cathy and I went to Alabama on a wing and a
prayer, with no jobs, a little money, and a lot of hope. "You shouldn't overspend at the moment. Frugality is important."That
was Cathy's. It was oddly appropriate for the day because we had gone
to Sears in the morning looking at HDTVs. It was a lark, totally
unplanned. I asked her, "Why now?" and she said, "Because we can." We
did not buy anything. Maybe we will buy some college classes, instead.
That sort of thing is why our TV is 15 years old. "Now is a good time for a new collection or hobby."That
was Arlando's. His response was simple, "I already have a new hobby. My
hobby is girls." Yes, it is. You should see the vanity photos he has
for his Facebook page. He says it is harder to meet girls since he quit
football. I know I should not expect it to be otherwise, but I am
disappointed that by the twenty-first century we have not grown past
such foolishness. I am also disappointed that we have squandered our
time making SUVs and wars instead of healing people and reducing our
impact on the planet. We have had such a failure of imagination. "People willingly believe what they wish."I have been carrying that one around for some time. It reminds me to ask myself, "What do you get from believing that?"
They are just random fortunes inside of mediocre cookies, but they sure
can make you think. They should bring them before the meal to serve as
conversation starters. Shalom, all, Ron
| | |
| Today
at 2:06pm Eastern and 1:06pm Central (USA) will be the Summer Solstice;
the Sun at its highest and Spring becomes Summer. Enjoy the longest day
of the year!
| | |
| The Prayer Garden
[Also posted at the original Barber's Paradox]
Dr. Nancy Pope taught me how to write well
— just barely. The class was Composition Practicuum, if I recall, and our
text was Zinsser's "On Writing Well" (I highly recommend it). She and the writer
encouraged us to strive for the standards of The New Yorker. That was one tough
class, but I thought of myself as a good writer so I was determined to do my
best. Our first assignment was a two-page essay. I wrote about the prayer garden
in the Baptist resort at Glorietta, New Mexico. I tried to mimic the style of
Douglas Adams by using clever sarcasm. Dr. Pope tore it apart. Her most poignant
criticism was that it seemed like I was trying to be clever and that I never got
my point over. She said something like, "You do not win many friends by being
clever”. I took that lesson to heart, but it took all semester to learn
how to get it right. For our final assignment we rewrote our original essays.
The paper got me my A – one of only two in the class. Dr. Pope was very
pleased and asked how I managed such a turnaround. I told her, "I forced myself
to be brutally honest. I considered every sentence with the question, 'What am I
really trying to say?'” It was the first time I wrote something that was
actually good.
The
Garden by Ron
Hutcherson edu8232 April 20,
1992 First
rewrite Instructor: Nancy
Pope
The prayer garden lies in the
mountains of New Mexico in a small town named Glorietta, just thirty minutes
north and west of Santa Fe, at the edge of the Southern Baptist national
conference center. Visitors to the center visit the garden for many reasons and
they have many different experiences. My experience was a lesson in
humility.
On the way to Glorietta, my
friends who had been there before shared their experiences of the garden with
me. I heard such things as how beautiful the garden was, but mostly I heard that
it is a great place to take a girl. I was not very impressed from their tales;
most gardens are beautiful and I did not think it was appropriate to use a
prayer garden as a place of courtship. The idea of a prayer garden also seemed
pretentious, leaving me with images of serene monks in humble clothing
surrounded by birds and small white
rabbits.
The creators of the garden
knew far more than I did about the pace of a conference center and the need for
a quiet place. It was student week at Glorietta, and there were two thousand
other college students there. The student missions conference is a fast and busy
week. We attended two church services a day led by famous speakers such as poet
Calvin Miller and Foreign Missions Board president Keith Parks. We got up early
and went to bed late, and we took seminar courses with topics ranging from
Christian Apologetics to Christian clowning. So, while I loved the people, the
classes, and the speakers, I found myself in need of a quiet
place.
Finding the prayer garden was a
greater task than I expected. To protect it from the hustle and bustle of the
conference, it was placed far up the slope of the mountain at the very border of
the conference center, and no signs were provided to suggest its location.
Glorietta sits just five hundred feet higher than Denver, Colorado, so the air
is very rare. I was often surprised to find myself gasping for breath after
doing exercises as simple as standing up, so the walk to the garden left me very
tired. This is the best defense that the place has against noisy people; none
but the serious would be willing to take such a
trek.
The garden was a surprise. It was
beautiful, but there were no flowers and the half-expected monks were replaced
by the occasional student reading the Holy Bible. It was so quiet that it
shocked me, at first. I could hear rabbits run through the grass and birds move
through the treetops. I was also surprised by its size. It must have been a
quarter of a mile across, and the open spaces were separated by bushes. The
ground was terraced, which also helped to separate the open spaces. Each terrace
had its own paths which led to different sheltered sitting places. I was
surprised often to turn a corner and find a student when I thought nobody was
near.
The garden was split from the top
terrace to the bottom by a stream bed of stonework. In the center I discovered
the heart of the garden: the baptismal font. The water in the font was stagnant,
but the meaning of the garden shone through — baptism is a symbol of new
life and communion with God — and the noise of a day of church and classes
flowed away. I then saw that what made the prayer garden special was not the way
it was made, but its history. The history of the garden was so strong that it
seemed to still be going on. Trees were carved with the names of young couples
who had fallen in love, there was a podium in a stone amphitheater dedicated in
honor of someone's service, and decades of prayer, insight, and communion with
God echoed from the trees. I was wrong to think that the prayer garden is
pretentious. The prayer, study, and communion are real, and it is not a place
for show.
Returning at night, tiptoeing
past couples and dodging flashlight-laden hikers seeking to conquer the mountain
peak, I sought out a place where the sky could be seen through the canopy of
pines. In the mountains, the stars and the Milky Way galaxy are many times
clearer and brighter than they can be seen in the city, and the flare of the
occasional meteor seems to bring the heavens nearer. The garden is place to a
contemplate heaven, and at night, in this place of prayer, heaven refuses to be
ignored. A voice in the darkness sang, "O Lord my God, when I in awesome wonder,
consider all the works thy hands have made..." My self-righteous prejudice was
gone, and I was left humbled.
| | |
| -
Entry for May 21, 2007 - "Here Come the Planes"
Abstract:
In the 1980s, Laurie Anderson made this remarkable song about our
military-industrial complex and the U.S. government's use of force. The
music is a bit challenging but the words are telling. I have included
sections of the song O Superman throughout this weblog. Her line "Here
come the planes" is quite ironic. My part of the web log tells about my
experiences on 9/11/2001. O Superman (Laurie Anderson)…Hello? Is anybody home? Well, you don't know me, but I know you. And I've got a message to give to you. Here come the planes. …
I sat on the stool watching my students quietly doing work, and
answering some questions. It was a quiet sunny morning and this was my
Library Class. They were so quiet and orderly (and disengaged) that I
called them my Library class. I was teaching 'Practical Math' at
Riverview Gardens High School; my students were juniors and seniors
picking up some easy math credit. An announcement came over the
intercom while I was talking. I was annoyed (there are so many
interruptions to teaching) but had to respect the announcements. We
became silent and listened for the message to repeat. It was saying
something about the U.S. being under attack. The first building had
been hit, maybe the second. Neither had gone down yet, I think. In the
five remaining minutes left of class time, we all sat still, stunned.
That was where I was on September 11, 2001. At the end of class, some remained. They asked me what I thought was going to happen. "I am afraid,"
I said, "I am afraid that the nation will go crazy together and we will
go to war." Later that day and the next morning I had the
Brats. They were Freshmen, mostly, almost all girls, and they talked
over my lectures like they were in the cafeteria. The course was
Algebra I, but today the topic was fear. These younger teens needed
more hand-holding, and today they were showing me some respect. "No," I
said, "They will not attack again like this. The planes are grounded
and this is the sort you can only do once," or at least once in a
generation, but I did not tell them that. "Yes, Saint Louis has many
targets but They do not have the resources or interest in attacking the
place where your mother works," I said to one girl. She was honestly
afraid that her mother might be killed and she wanted to be with her —
at home. I think she was the one that sucked her thumb. I tried to help
them put it into perspective. In the 1980s we had our own terror, I
told them, every generation has its own terror, this was not new, and
life and the country always goes on. I told them they had worse things
to worry about than Bin Laden, that in my generation we were very
worried about the threat of Nuclear Holocaust. I got blank stares, and
someone actually asked what that was. I was stunned.
How could children not know about the danger of nuclear war? Then I
realized that they had all grown up after the Berlin Wall went down,
after the end of the Cold War. "You know, like in War Games," I said,
"How many of you have seen War Games?" Only a few. I had to give them a
primer (pronounced with a long i, not like 'primmer' — the root word is
Prime, not prim) on it, telling them that before the Wall came down, we
had Reagan and he was arming us to the teeth and talking Star Wars
(Reagan's imaginary but very expensive missile defense program). Star
Wars threatened the balance of power that gave us our only real
protection: Mutual Assured Destruction (MAD). Nuclear war
was the topic of many movies. Some tried to show what a nuclear
holocaust would be like but most focused on how easily one could start.
My high school peers worried along with me whether Saint Louis, with
its heavy arms industry, would be a target. Yet, there were enough
missiles to kill every city, so it was a moot point. We feared that a
nuclear holocaust was just one itchy trigger finger away. It might all
end tomorrow and the only ones left would be the cockroaches. Prince's
"1999" became a smash hit. Around the world there were
protests against the nuclear arms buildup, but it seemed to me that the
movie War Games made the first real change. It provided a clear
argument against MAD that my generation understood, and it gave us an
alternative: "The only way to win is not to play." Then there was
Reagan's START treaty, Gorbachev, and George H. W. Bush, and then the
collapse of the Soviet Union. Some of my students were
amazed, some had glassed-over eyes, and some really got it. The thing
is, I told them, we still are under threat of a nuclear holocaust and
it is just a matter of will that keeps us from a total annihilation
that will make the 9-11 attacks almost trivial. And I said: OK. Who is this really? And the voice said: This is the hand, the hand that takes. This is the hand, the hand that takes. This is the hand, the hand that takes. Here come the planes. They're American planes. Made in America. Smoking or non-smoking? And the voice said: Neither snow nor rain nor gloom of night shall stay these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds.
Other classes asked me what I thought was
going to happen and I repeated, "I am afraid. I am afraid that the
nation will go crazy together and we will go to war. It does not matter
who with, but we will not be satisfied until we have shed blood." I
said that I expected us to take on Afghanistan and that it might not be
so bad if we destroyed the Taliban. Bush and the propagandists (aka
pundits) had been hinting about going back to finish off Iraq since the
previous December, so I said not to be surprised if we took on Iraq, too.
Almost all of the students agreed with me on this one thing: these were
criminals, not an army, and we should get the world with us and hunt
them down and put them on trial. Almost none of my students wanted war.
In 1990, it was unthinkable that the US would ever start a war. In
2002, we did. We were the benign superpower; now we are Rome.  'Cause when love is gone, there's always justice. And when justice is gone, there's always force. And when force is gone, there's always Mom. Hi Mom! So hold me, Mom, in your long arms. So hold me, Mom, in your long arms. In your automatic arms. Your electronic arms. In your arms. So hold me, Mom, in your long arms. Your petrochemical arms. Your military arms. In your electronic arms.
| | |
|